PDA

View Full Version : Regarding The Issue Of Standing In Relation To The "helf cayuh" BS



coon catcher
03-10-2010, 12:23 PM
I have wondered why niggerboy would be in such a hurry to pass its "helfcayah",even though it would not take effect until it is out of office. This tidbit here(from http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-and-congress-file-their.html) seems to explain a potential reason for that.

"I would like to point out that this appeal opens up a class action justification v. Obama if the Congress rams through the current attempt at a "Health Care" Bill. The defense in this opposition brief focuses our atention on the hair holding their sword of Damocles over their case:
“‘[A] plaintiff raising only a generally available grievance about government--claiming only harm to his and every citizen’s interest IN PROPER APPLICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS, and seeking relief that no more directly and tangibly benefits him than it does the public at large--does not state an Article III case or controversy.’” App. 9 (quoting
Lujan, 504 U.S. at 573-74). And that an Article III is
“an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.” Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560.
Healthcare tax via the Healthcare Bill, is a form of forced extortion upon and from employers. Employers, who would rather pay the fine than provide the more expensive plans, is an illegal form of taxation, and an actual legal invasion of one's First Amendment rights, as well as a violation of the Sixth and Tenth Amendments. Layoffs too, resulting as a direct consequence of the legislation is also a concrete harm.
Further, because of the scope and reach of the Healthcare legislation, and the questionale language of ambiguities that may allow some dictatorial empowerments, it can be challenged on the basis of needing both a super-majority and a legal United Staes natural-born citizen President that can sign the bill into lawful legislation. The Heathcare bill rises to the level of usurpation of First and Tenth Amendment rights of both individuals and States as neding to be pass as an amendment to the US Constitution in which a super-majority of both houses of Congress and of the individual states must ratify such or have it thrown out.
This challenge, via Healthcare, will enable funding and alliances heretofore unimagined, and allow us to tap into the heart and pulse of this pre-election 2010 nation's majority will, in which a US Citizens v. Obama and the Healthcare Bill legislation would quickly ally perhaps tens of millions to sign such a petition, and some perhaps donate. A legal action against the coercion of any signed Healthcare legislation and of Obama on the basis of the lack of a US NBC status will have real Article III legal "teeth" to it that will chomp the pro-Obama opposition arguments to bits before the eyes of Court. "

So if I am reading this right,then niggerboy 's handlers already knew passing the "helfcare"and making it take effect immediately would create standing and genuine concrete harm. The immediate enactment of the bill would give rise to legit, class action lawsuits on every level. The bill would generate standing and clearly identifiable concrete harm.

Another reason it is delayed from becoming active until niggerboy is out???